Interracial Blogs > Jammer2's blogs > I wonder why?
I wonder why? Sort by:
Members Only
Posted on Sun, Jun 22, 2008 01:00 PM

I made a comment on a blog yesterday, and lo and behold, today it was gone. For those who didn't get to see it here is the comment. It was made on the blog WHICH ARE YOU? where the writer lists the various types of bloggers. My comment was: You forgot one. The one that decides a subject is too trivial or mundane and reacts with scathing insult and vicious personal attack out of all proportion to the alleged offense. END OF COMMENT Now, normally I don't take the bait. But this time.. Don't start your cr-p with me, eyersch,ayersch, irishmist or whatever you call yourself these days. Ban all the comments you want but your rants and raves are really getting old. And your insensitivity is just amazing. You dogged one poor woman so bad she hasn't been heard from in months. An online meltdown isn't pretty and you helped it right along. Calling it the way you see it is one thing, but plain old disrespect and bullying to appease your overinflated sense of worth is just old fashioned chickens--t. You really should learn some manners. Now ban that.

Like Reply / add comments Quote | Report Bookmark and Share
Follow - email me when people comment
Members Only
Posted on Tue, Dec 16, 2008 01:10 AM

they cost too much....

Like Reply / add comments Quote | Report Bookmark and Share
Members Only
Posted on Sat, Nov 15, 2008 12:11 AM

]quote[you dont want to take any kind of responsibility of yourself and your own behaviour, and that is sad... ]quote[... then be sad... you edit for your own convenience and argument... left out the juice....that's what is sad... ergo your intent becomes questionable... to quote: "to suggest i had nothing to do with it would be asinine, to suggest that i wanted to do it would be just as asinine, to suggest that one or more has left due to exchanges emanating from this k-bord or another would be a complete misconception on the part of you and whoever prefers to enjoy that interpretation..." no dollar here...

Members Only
Like Reply / add comments Quote | Report Bookmark and Share
Members Only
Posted on Wed, Jun 25, 2008 10:22 AM

]quote[For your part Rumple I do not know how all this got started. All I know is that Pamela made an innocuous comment on a blog of yours and you belittled and insulted her for no apparent reason and then I saw a blog she wrote complaining about your behavior.]quote[ you honor me too much and judging by the length and context of the post you just don't get it and probably never will... for the umpteenth time for YOU it was started with a malaprop... innocuous comment with innocuous answer and should have ended there... SHE didn't... the blog itself was odd... that everyone MUST vote for Obama because Hillary speaks with arrogance, entitlement and condensation.... rump went on 'condensation' and decided to have his windshield defroster checked.... damselindistress got stressed... you say mockery and ridicule against satire and metaphor... you post 'freak show' personal descriptive items... rump wouldn't even dignify any of those with a comeback... THOSE are demeaning and unnecessary... for example YOU decided to engage in an open exchange w/eyersch that went something like(paraphrased and out of context) she said: that you said you don't want to go out w/me because i have a fat a33. and you said that she said: i don't want to go out with you because you have a fat a33. the intelligent thing to have done was not to answer to begin with. BUT YOU DID...!!! it could/should have ended there. it didn't... you didn't. the subject was irrelevant and shoulda/coulda ended there. in passing the real question was never answered. do YOU have a fat a33...??? ladybug... again ladybug... ladybuggered... you are correct about one thing with her... the medical profile is correct. BUT EXACTLY WHAT DID YOU DO TO HELP/ASSIST HER other than meeyowling how she was forced to exit off the site to add to your 'ax to grind' postings...??? your self described consulting and chatting support appears to be more self-serving than deserving. rumple's authorings...??? your perception being that they are pointed and attacking...??? unbelievable, but that is YOUR entitlement... in contrast, that is like my viewing one of your artistic manifestations and claiming that you are insulting me or someone specifically and is grossly malicious and you should be ostracized from the community and have all grants shut down... i think not, grasshopper... freak show, indeed... who's watching the watchers...??? you want it YOUR way...??? the BK way...??? start your blog or even better... your own site... part of human nature, the condition human... if you can't see it for what it is or how it is... then rework it to make YOU happy...it gives support to the belief that man is self destructive...if verbal fails... head for physical... rumple does NOT engage in personal attacks but all offers will be considered on a case by case basis... however you might become an exception... ]quote[For your part Rumple I do not know how all this got started. All I know is that Pamela made an innocuous comment on a blog of yours and you belittled and insulted her for no apparent reason and then I saw a blog she wrote complaining about your behavior. I made a comment on her blog in support of her but suggested that she not use your name in the blog title and she took that blog down. After my comment I chatted with her and told her not to take your comments personally because you had done something similar to LadynRed. As for Eyersch I am not certain how this all got started but I think it might been when she was hatched and burst out of that guy's stomach in Alien.]quote[ how provocative you pick up the sword of words and you totally contradict yourself... you don't know how all this got started yet you have things to say about them... you are VERRRRY confused and your distorted sense of support(compassion not included) may very well be a cover for what lies deeper... the ax-grinding and more in common with who you represent as 'victims' than you care to admit...and at the same time nothing to do with them at hall, but, at best, a vehicle to vindicate your ego with eyersch... simply marvy... as well, was not certain that acting in concert was a source of energy... more like a 'rock' concert, as in throwing... interesting you ASSume there is a duet here... but that's what the word is all about... PHAT you are not... surprised i am, tho', that YOU ARE that vulnerable in personal relationships.... as said before c'est dommage... transparency is a wonderful medium...appears that yours is 2 dimensional... you missed a plane...

Members Only
Like Reply / add comments Quote | Report Bookmark and Share
Members Only
Posted on Wed, Jun 25, 2008 08:21 AM

Quoting: Originally posted by jammer2 The Gang Of Three... I like the sound of that....sort of a cross between High Noon and Gunfight at the OK corral....

a cross between high noon and gunfight at the ok corral... hmmmmmmmm... a cross between two atheis..... nooooooooo, better not finish that... might start shooting blanks again... along with sling blade......mmmmmmmm_hmmmmm CAREFUL jammer.... gang of three may be more of a menage a trois than you wish... unlessssssss...... nahhhhhhhh.... say it ain't so....like not even for pecan pie.....you...??? inna 3-some...??? nahhhhhhhhhh...... i wonder why... great song... dion and the belmonts.... doo-wop on a street corner....

Members Only
Like Reply / add comments Quote | Report Bookmark and Share
Members Only
Posted on Wed, Jun 25, 2008 08:15 AM

Quoting: Originally posted by dave45039 OK now I'm really pissed, I realize I'm the junior member here, but why do I only get two letters of my name in there?

take another look... the 'E" may be representative of a common-law relationship, having more in common than most realize being that some things need to be shared... another SN might be the unholy trinity, but that might not be appropriate... aside from that it really sounds like a body cream or naval jelly or KY with a twist... THE NEW K-Y...!!! with the secret ingredient JAMAVEX-B3...!!! comes in three types.... left, right and ambidextrous... for all hands on events... for best results, use vigorously....

Like Reply / add comments Quote | Report Bookmark and Share
Members Only
Posted on Wed, Jun 25, 2008 06:51 AM

The Gang Of Three... I like the sound of that....sort of a cross between High Noon and Gunfight at the OK corral....

Like Reply / add comments Quote | Report Bookmark and Share
Members Only
Posted on Wed, Jun 25, 2008 06:27 AM

Quoting: Originally posted by exb3 "..even your GANG OF 3 COLLECTIVELY NAMED "JAMAVEX-B3" Eyersch, Forgive my bitterness but Jamavex-b3 is only part of the gang . If you included the entire line up against eyersch, ayerish, irishmist, dublin then the collective name is jamavexb3pamladykarmirphillypreferjaminl ngarinekillian. Not a gang of 3 but an entire baseball team. That's only the starting line up not counting the ones on the bench.

OK now I'm really pissed, I realize I'm the junior member here, but why do I only get two letters of my name in there?

Like Reply / add comments Quote | Report Bookmark and Share
Members Only
Posted on Wed, Jun 25, 2008 06:02 AM

Haven't been for a while but the last time I went to the carnival and went to the freak show to see the guy bite the head off a chicken I only had to pay a dollar. Are you guys charging more because there are two of you? Since you give your clown act away for free it is unrealistic to think you are going to get more than a dollar for your freak show. For your part Rumple I do not know how all this got started. All I know is that Pamela made an innocuous comment on a blog of yours and you belittled and insulted her for no apparent reason and then I saw a blog she wrote complaining about your behavior. I made a comment on her blog in support of her but suggested that she not use your name in the blog title and she took that blog down. After my comment I chatted with her and told her not to take your comments personally because you had done something similar to LadynRed. As for Eyersch I am not certain how this all got started but I think it might been when she was hatched and burst out of that guy's stomach in Alien. I know Eyersch thinks I am critical of her because she rejected me two years ago and I am bitter and unhappy. Eyersch seems to think her behavior is beyond reproach. Although I support gay marriage I hope Rumple does not also think I am critical of him because I am not his type. My criticism of the two of you is because of your behavior on the blogs. While I have been a vocal critic of the two of you I have not been the only one. I am tired of seeing people bullied by your clique. Eyersch is the one who does it constantly but Rumple's "KS, 4BM & the fishbowl...." and "women to avoid online" blogs both were unnecessary and held 4BM and LadynRed up to ridicule when neither of them had done anything to merit personal attacks. If LadynRed is the person who was having the online meltdown both eyersch and rumple were no help with their unrelenting insults and mockery. Eyersch seems to think because I flattered her two years ago that I would make a deal with the devil to be with her. Eyersch was not the first or the last woman to find me not to her liking. I don't know why she thinks that her rejection made such a strong impact on me. Apparently she feels her behavior is beyond reproach and all the people who have criticized her and all the times she has been thrown off this site she has been unfairly persecuted. I was physically attracted to her 2 years ago but I thought I made it abundantly clear how I feel about her as a person now. Before I chimed in on the " I'm no Pollyanna" blog I had absolutely no contact with Eyersch for 2 years. For two years I did not say anything while she went on her witch hunts and mocked and insulted people left and right even though I found her behavior offensive and at times bizarre. I did not say anything until BarbiQ wrote her " I am no Pollyanna.." blog. I responded to that blog because it expressed how I had come to feel after two years of seeing her antics and I felt that Ladynred had been treated with particular cruelty given her state of mind when she wrote her " Angel of Death" blog. I also had problems with the quality and quantity of Rumple's comments but I simply ignored him until he came to Eyersch defense in BarbiQ's blog.I have said some harsh and nasty things about rumple and eyersch but in my defense I think there is a difference between standing up to bullies and being a bully. If Eyersch and Rumple would just simply stop mocking and insulting people there would be no reason for all this rancor. We can go on trading insults back and forth till the cows come home but as much as I am enjoying this this is pointless. I don't have as much as stake here as some other people seem to have and I am already beginning to get bored and have other things to do. Just like Phillygirl could have made a positive contribution to the blogs so could have Pamela. But just like the clique ganged up on Phillygirl Rumple and Eyersch targeted Pamela and now she is leaving and now the blogs are back to being the Eyersch and Rumple show.

Reply / add comments Quote | Report Bookmark and Share
Members Only
Posted on Wed, Jun 25, 2008 02:13 AM

I have said time and again, my interests are simple. A reasoned, rational discourse between adults without rancour and disrespect. You don't do that. You don't come close. Disrespecting and degrading someone just because you can takes away from the purpose of having a conversation. If the subject is too menial or banal for you, then don't comment. Or be tactful enough to communicate that without being insulting.

Like Reply / add comments Quote | Report Bookmark and Share
Members Only
Posted on Tue, Jun 24, 2008 10:15 PM

"..even your GANG OF 3 COLLECTIVELY NAMED "JAMAVEX-B3" Eyersch, Forgive my bitterness but Jamavex-b3 is only part of the gang . If you included the entire line up against eyersch, ayerish, irishmist, dublin then the collective name is jamavexb3pamladykarmirphillypreferjaminl ngarinekillian. Not a gang of 3 but an entire baseball team. That's only the starting line up not counting the ones on the bench.

Reply / add comments Quote | Report Bookmark and Share
Members Only
Posted on Tue, Jun 24, 2008 07:41 PM

quote[They have driven another blogger away. If they keep it up one day no one will be left but the two of them.]quote[ body count...??? there's a body count...??? gonna need a list of names... notify family, friends... no reason for the accolades... not needed not wanted...it was not a task or mission... never was, never will be... if someone has left the building, that was their decision... to suggest i had nothing to do with it would be asinine, to suggest that i wanted to do it would be just as asinine, to suggest that one or more has left due to exchanges emanating from this k-bord or another would be a complete misconception on the part of you and whoever prefers to enjoy that interpretation... the irony of the contents of your post is that it started with a malaprop in a public arena... very easy to point fingers when denial is in the mix...and an agenda is involved on your part... c'est dommage on the exit... it was still their decision... got a buck...??? only a buck...???

Members Only
Like Reply / add comments Quote | Report Bookmark and Share
Members Only
Posted on Tue, Jun 24, 2008 03:24 PM

Congratulation to Eyersch and Rumple on their latest victim. Their body count is up to at least 3 now. They have driven another blogger away. If they keep it up one day no one will be left but the two of them. Eyersch will have no one left to insult but Rumple and Rumple will have no one to impress but Eyersch. That would be an interesting match up. Sort of like Dracula vs Frankenstein or Alien vs Predator. I'd pay a dollar to see that. Sorry Rumple but my money is on Eyersch. Although you have the brains Eyersch is meaner.

Reply / add comments Quote | Report Bookmark and Share
Members Only
Posted on Tue, Jun 24, 2008 12:52 PM

Smooth, brother. Did she even feel the blade?

Like Reply / add comments Quote | Report Bookmark and Share
Members Only
Posted on Tue, Jun 24, 2008 04:18 AM

Eyersch, In my previous post to you I said; "Eyersch, If there were some way to prove a negative, I would invite you to do so" Your response; "JUST WHEN I THOUGHT YOU WERE "GETTING IT"..... HOW DOES ANYONE "PROVE" THEY DIDN'T DO SOMETHING" I went on to say; "Until then, the evidence supports Jammers claim of censorship on your part, if there is no change in evidence, I will stand by what I said." Your response; "SOMETIMES IT'S THE ACTUAL POST-ER, REMOVING THEIR OWN WORDS.." I went on; "I deleted my own post(actually two) from your "LETTER" blog simply because I found out from this blog that you are censoring. Now that's a shame because I thought that one(your 'letters' blog) could become a healthy and enlightening exchange, more of the type that I would prefer to participate in," Your response; " I NEVER TOUCHED YOUR COMMENTS..AND..I EVEN WAS HAPPY TO RESPOND..IF YOU HAD BOTHERED YOUR "FOLLOW -THE-POPULAR" VOTE HERE." I then addressed Pamela; "by your own admission, you are also censoring, be warned, if you do so, you are also limiting the people who are willing to participate in your discussions......" Your Two Cents; "YOU ALL HAVE BEEN DUPED, BY THE TRUE CENSOR HERE" Her response; "I will not limit people who want to participate in a discussion. For those who just drop in, not even reading the blog, to post insults and abuse wanting attention....if I am/we are not fighting this then I am/we are condoning it." So my point? simple, you're apparently not reading the entire post before you get abrasive OR you need help in your reading comprehension skills. For the former try reading S-L-O-W-E-R, for the latter, hire a tutor, ask Pamela for her advice, maybe she is willing to help you, I'm not, I'm finished with both of Ya'. Get it?

Like Reply / add comments Quote | Report Bookmark and Share
Members Only
Posted on Tue, Jun 24, 2008 02:25 AM

You miss the point,Irish. You're a jerk and a bully, plain and simple.

Like Reply / add comments Quote | Report Bookmark and Share
Members Only
Posted on Tue, Jun 24, 2008 12:06 AM

Quoting: Originally posted by Pamela_NM Antisocial Personality Disorder may explain why some people behave the way they do. If you take this as your own I have no control over that. I have named no one. I find it interesting, and a little creepy, that all my words here are being copied. Yes, I have gone back and revised, usually within an hour, to clarify my meaning. I will work harder in getting it down the first time since this seems such an issue for some.

authors editors and publishers do it all the time whether it all the time when there is a distribution...books documents, papers, reports, contracts, yada yada yada. the difference being that the original is still out there while annotating the revisions regardless of editing, deleting or appending... it is not just a courtesy, it is more of a legal/compliance issue so there will not be any misinterpretations when they are issued...

Members Only
Like Reply / add comments Quote | Report Bookmark and Share
Members Only
Posted on Mon, Jun 23, 2008 02:16 PM

]quote[Pamela, by your own admission, you are also censoring, be warned, if you do so, you are also limiting the people who are willing to participate in your discussions......]]] dave45039 [[[ I will not limit people who want to participate in a discussion.]quote[ you have from the very begininng and have been on the upswing of frequency and a flagrant abuser delete/edit activity and continue to do... BUT...!!! you do have right to do so, regardless of what anyone says positive or negative... AND IF BROUGHT TO YOUR ATTENTION IN WHATEVER FORM... GETOVERIT.... 'tis about the message, not the messenger....

Members Only
Like Reply / add comments Quote | Report Bookmark and Share
Members Only
Posted on Mon, Jun 23, 2008 03:16 AM

I don't turn ugly on people.(at least not since 1993. that was the last time somebody shot at me and yes it did get ugly for a minute or two.They lost, by the way) You, on the other hand(eyersch)went postal on me in my very first comment here. I believe you described me as an 'idiot', along with a few other choice pieces of the english language. I'm quite sure that if I hadn't responded so forcefully right away you would have done your best to tie me to the whipping post to be publicly gutted by your razor sharp wit. Now Pamela seems to be your 'designated victim' and she ain't rolling over and playing dead either. You've threatened to 'reveal humiliating private information', legal action and a host of other things. This is stuff I read in your posts,not made up of whole cloth. You are a bully. Your so called regard for my intellect simply means I can defend myself from you, thats all. I am not afraid of you. I simply want that people are treated with respect irregardless of how much you may disagree with them. You don't do that until someone punches back. If combativeness is the only criteria you use to decide if someone is wothy of respect, you got a real problem. Back off. My enemies come in two catagories: those that have been dealt with and those that haven't been dealt with yet. Choose your catagory.

Like Reply / add comments Quote | Report Bookmark and Share
Members Only
Posted on Mon, Jun 23, 2008 03:07 AM

]quote[DAVE..step back!..be very careful to make statements you have no real knowledge of!...i find it very interesting , that because o f my edginess on here, you pressume i deleted a comment from JAMMER...i stand by the fact..i did not!!..and will await an apology.]quote[ Eyersch, If there were some way to prove a negative, I would invite you to do so and after your evidence is evaluated I would certainly apologize to you if I were proven wrong. Until then, the evidence supports Jammers claim of censorship on your part, if there is no change in evidence, I will stand by what I said. I'm OK with people deleting their own posts if they decide they're wrong, misinformed, not interested, etc. Can't say I like it because it screws up the context of what was said, but it's sometimes understandable. However when you delete someone else's post, that's censorship and completely unacceptable to my sense of fair play. I deleted my own post(actually two) from your "LETTER" blog simply because I found out from this blog that you are censoring. Now that's a shame because I thought that one(your 'letters' blog) could become a healthy and enlightening exchange, more of the type that I would prefer to participate in, but didn't want the censorship of what I might have to say,what a loss. Damn shame when you lose trust...... For the record, I recieved one e-mail from Pamela and immediately answered her on the blog. I don't agree with the back door stuff either unless it needs to be private. My e-mail to you, I thought you would be more comfortable with what I had to say privately.... Pamela, by your own admission, you are also censoring, be warned, if you do so, you are also limiting the people who are willing to participate in your discussions......

Like Reply / add comments Quote | Report Bookmark and Share
Follow - email me when people comment